Monday, July 8, 2013

Could Lac-Megantic train derailment be a false flag ?

Could Lac-Megantic train derailment be a false flag ?

    Although information about the train derailment and explosions on the weekend are still sketchy and more information is still coming in, there has been some speculation in conspiracy circles that the train derailment, explosions and fire that may have killed dozens of people in Lac-Megantic, Quebec on Saturday may be the work of globalist elites.

    The cause of the accident is believed to be a runaway train. The president and CEO of Rail World Inc., the parent company of Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, said the train had been parked uphill of Lac-Megantic. The tanker cars then sped downhill into the town before derailing. There is also rumor that a fire on this same train was extinguished hours before the train started rolling on its own with no driver or crew aboard the train.

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced he was heading to the town Sunday. Because of limited pipeline capacity in Canada, oil producers are using railroads to transport much of the oil to refineries on the East, Gulf and West coasts, as well as inland. Harper has called railroad transit "far more environmentally challenging" while trying to persuade the Obama administration to approve the controversial Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to the Gulf Coast.  Harper also wishes to build pipelines both east and west from Alberta to both coasts.

    There has been much protest against new pipelines being built in Canada. The majority of this protest has come from the idle no more movement and green environmentalists. In fact during some recent blockades there has been some talk that the socialist anarchists (Fake Activists) may have even tampered with rail way signals.  

    If it is determined that the train disaster in Lac-Megantic, Quebec on Saturday is sabotage ( and there is already talk of that) then they may be looking to hang this on the far left environmentalists. But we must ask ourselves if this was no accident then who would have the most to gain from this? Already the media has broadcast residents of the destroyed town saying they no longer want trains with oil to come through their area. Seems to me the people who have the most to gain from this rail disaster are the people and oil companies that want these pipelines built and that this incident will be held up as a good reason to do so, much in the same way 9/11 has been used as an excuse for the war in Afghanistan and the G-20 budget.

    Keep in mind this is nothing more than speculation at this point and there is no hard proof one way or the other. But with the ever shifting political climate in Canada it does make one wonder.   

Lawrence McCurry

July 8, 2013


  1. There we go...I can already smell the stench of Conserveral political spin...

    "Look at what happened! Now we HAVE TO build more pipelines...we can't use these 'unsafe trains' to transport our precious oil any more...they're perfectly safe for YOU to travel on,'s just the OIL that needs a safer method..."

    Sort of like "We NEED 9 billion dollars worth of new prisons in a country with 30-year declining crime rates across the board...we're making medicinal cannabis illegal. Oh, now look at all of the BRAND NEW CRIMINALS just in time to fill up all of the new prison cells I TOLD YOU we needed!"

  2. Sure sounds to me like Ezra Levant and Greg Renouf are trying to make it a false flag by scapegoating native activists and "anarchists".

  3. Lawrence, on Monday you claimed that Lac Megantic would be used on a false flag by the government - then a few days ago Ezra Levant, who is closely linked in with the government and friends with several senior ministers, goes on his show to claim that Lac Megantic may have been an act of "terrorism" without any actual evidence to back him up i.e. he acted exactly as you'd expect someone to act when planting a "false flag". You should be using that as proof that you were right. Instead, you basically defend what he's doing. What gives?

    1. It was the corporation that owned the train that said it may be sabotage and the police said they are investigating.

      Ezra thinks (or points a finger) at the radical left anarchists. I disagree with with him, although the lefties would have done it in a heartbeat I don't think it was them this time. Their too stupid to have pulled this one off.

    2. Besides the left anarchists are really working for the same bankers and corporations (Globalistts) that control the government anyway. They are controlled opposition. fake activists and fake protesters anyway. So even if it was them the globalists who want a pipeline were still behind it??? I don't get your point??

  4. Ezra didn't say that RadLeft activists caused the train accident, he said that the CEO of the company said it could have been sabotage. If you'd had listened to him on the next day he made it clear that the CEO's story had changed.

    Regardless, RadLeft activists have been messing around with trains. Perhaps now, after this horrible disaster, they'll think twice before doing so- the results can be horrific.

  5. After reading some brief news postings on the net I have found that one thing that does not seem to be asked for and should be directly related is the compliance of the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act and Regulations which has some very specific instructions on what to do when shipping Dangerous Goods by any mode of transport. TSB is saying they have sent samples of the crude oil for testing. This is the most crucial information for the TDG regs for the shipper must classify and identify the DG product before shipping it. In this case the shipper is also the consignee because the product was imported. Once classification is known then the regulations guides us on how to, package using packaging standards, marking of the railcars using what is known as placards, and an accompanying document with has a full description of what is actually being carried by the railcars, and what to do in the event of a major spill.
    This should be one of the steps in the complete investigation as I see there are a number of regulations to be investigated.
    If all regulations where met then its simply an accident, whether intended or not. There are some very heavy fines for not reporting spills or being non compliant of these regulations especially if there was an intent to misrepresent the product, i.e. wrong classification.